(If you don’t know, memory or RAM is used by a computer when it is doing work and processing data. M1: Memory and storageĪll four of these Macs have 8GB of “unified memory” in their standard configurations. The 13-inch MacBook Pro’s performance is very close to the Mac mini, so it’s a worthy contender as well, but if you want the best price-to-performance ratio, the Mac mini is the way to go. If you can wait, hold off until results from the 24-inch iMac are in, but we expect they’ll be similar. Our take: If all you care about is getting the top-performing M1 Mac, then the Mac mini is for you. Geekbench 5 Compute GPU benchmark Mac model We’ll update the performance chart with iMac data as soon as possible. We expect the $1,299 iMac’s 7-core GPU to be slightly faster than the MacBook Air’s 7-core GPU, while the iMac’s 8-core GPU performance could be similar to the Mac mini. The 24-inch iMac has three standard configurations, starting with the low-end $1,299 model that has a 7-core GPU, and the $1,499 and $1,699 models with an 8-core GPU. The difference is 9 percent between the two MacBook Air models, and higher compared to the MacBook Pro and Mac mini, so if your work is graphic-heavy, consider spending a little more on the 8-core model. The $999 MacBook Air and the $1,299 iMac have a 7-core GPU that’s slower than the other M1 Macs, but you probably won’t notice a difference in general everyday use. Some Motion templates on this webpage are available from are the Geekbench 5 GPU results.Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac Studio and iMac. ![]() Pre-release Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a complex 5-minute project with 8K ProRes 422 media. Testing conducted by Apple in February 2022 using pre-production Mac Studio systems with Apple M1 Ultra, 20-core CPU, 64-core GPU, 128GB of RAM and 8TB SSD, as well as production 3.6GHz 10-core Intel Core i9–based 27-inch iMac systems with Radeon Pro 5700 XT graphics with 16GB of GDDR6, 128GB of RAM and 8TB SSD.Pre-release Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a 5-minute project with 4K Apple ProRes 4444 media, at 3840x2160 resolution and 23.98 frames per second, transcoded to Apple ProRes 422. ![]() Performance tests are conducted using specific computer systems and reflect the approximate performance of Mac Studio. Pre-release Final Cut Pro 10.6.2 tested using a 1-minute picture-in-picture project with 18 streams of Apple ProRes 422 video at 8192x4320 resolution and 30 frames per second, as well as a 1-minute picture-in-picture project with 56 streams of Apple ProRes 422 video at 3840x2160 resolution and 29.97 frames per second.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |